我欣賞本書(shu)的(de)(de)(de)實(shi)證風格。本書(shu)越過(guo)規范層(ceng)面,對(dui)沒(mei)(mei)收(shou)財(cai)產(chan)(chan)(chan)刑(xing)的(de)(de)(de)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)(yong)(yong)進(jin)行(xing)了(le)調研分(fen)(fen)析(xi)。通(tong)過(guo)對(dui)北京市(shi)18個區(qu)縣法院和(he)2個中級人民法院2003年(nian)(nian)~2007。年(nian)(nian)的(de)(de)(de)判決進(jin)行(xing)統(tong)計(ji)分(fen)(fen)析(xi),讓人們可(ke)以(yi)了(le)解(jie)不少真相,如沒(mei)(mei)收(shou)財(cai)產(chan)(chan)(chan)刑(xing)雖(sui)然(ran)涉及(ji)70余罪(zui)(zui)名(ming)。但法院每年(nian)(nian)實(shi)際(ji)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)(yong)(yong)的(de)(de)(de)罪(zui)(zui)名(ming)約為(wei)15個左右,5年(nian)(nian)間北京市(shi)沒(mei)(mei)收(shou)財(cai)產(chan)(chan)(chan)刑(xing)的(de)(de)(de)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)(yong)(yong)率(lv)平均為(wei)2。22%0在與罰金(jin)刑(xing)選(xuan)科時,法官(guan)罕用(yong)(yong)(yong)沒(mei)(mei)收(shou)財(cai)產(chan)(chan)(chan)刑(xing)。沒(mei)(mei)收(shou)財(cai)產(chan)(chan)(chan)刑(xing)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)(yong)(yong)率(lv)低,執(zhi)行(xing)率(lv)更低,沒(mei)(mei)收(shou)的(de)(de)(de)范圍或數額通(tong)常以(yi)實(shi)際(ji)扣(kou)押(ya)罪(zui)(zui)犯的(de)(de)(de)財(cai)產(chan)(chan)(chan)為(wei)限,有時竟然(ran)-9特(te)殊(shu)沒(mei)(mei)收(shou)混用(yong)(yong)(yong),導致(zhi)其實(shi)際(ji)適(shi)(shi)用(yong)(yong)(yong)的(de)(de)(de)嚴厲程度竟然(ran)普遍(bian)輕(qing)于罰金(jin)刑(xing)。這樣的(de)(de)(de)實(shi)證研究的(de)(de)(de)結(jie)果,對(dui)讀者無疑具有啟發意義。
Copyright © 1999-2024 法律(lv)圖書(shu)館(guan)
.
.